Appeal: ad hominem
From HEATED DEBATE! “jesusandwhatnot” Vs Jay Dyer! His ‘Gotcha’ Fails LOL.
- #100258:12overturned Jay Dyer psogos: ad hominem (+1) tempered from minor to minor
The council overturned the call, so no points were given away.
“So you dumbass Muslim countries, you don't even have Internet. You hardly the dial up at your countries doesn't even work.”
Diogenes: A jab at a caller's nationality over a microphone problem: it bears on no point in dispute, rests on nothing, and plays to the crowd.Herodotus (yes): No opponent is named in this segment (the caller with the bad microphone is not identified on the board), so this isn't a two-party feud with a documented back-and-forth history — but the site's own ledger already establishes the pattern the callout invokes: Jay Dyer carries 15 upheld ad hominem findings across 24 debates here, the single largest fault category on his record. Public YouTube history corroborates a long-running, often heated dynamic between Dyer and Muslim callers/apologists (Shabir Ali, Paul Williams, Muslim Lantern, Jake the Muslim Metaphysician) stretching back roughly eight years, the same run of grievances Dyer himself recounts immediately before the quoted jab. So while this specific remark has no unique prior history with this specific caller, it fits an established, already-adjudicated pattern rather than being an isolated lapse — the council should weigh the "minor" severity against a debater who has been repeatedly flagged for exactly this conduct. Sources: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ti06GhBgwL0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DjuCmuCoa0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbxmrEG2W28 https://www.youtube.com/live/iyXu2npB0HI
- Aristotle overturn: On the record: Jay Dyer has held throughout the stream that he freely riffs, jokes, and mocks callers and absent parties alike between substantive exchanges; this line is part of that between-calls patter directed at no one who is actually on the floor to answer it, so it is not a departure into argument-substituting ad hominem. Between the "Unmute" prompt at 57:59 and the next caller "Macy" at 58:20, no caller ever speaks — nobody unmutes, nobody is on the floor, and the jab is not addressed to or answered by any present opponent. This is a monologue filling dead air while waiting for a caller's mic, not a callout made against someone present in an exchange, so under the floor principle it is not judged as ad hominem or any other fault.
- Socrates overturn: Read blind, found nothing worth calling. This jab is thrown out while Dyer is trying to get a caller's mic to connect ("What's up man? Unmute" ... "Macy, what's up?"), not in answer to or answered by any opponent presently on the floor — no Muslim caller is engaged in exchange with him at this moment, and none responds to it. Per the floor rule, mockery flung at nobody present is not judged on either ledger.
- Plato uphold: On the record: Jay Dyer's consistent posture toward Muslim callers throughout the stream is combative rhetoric mixed with substantive debate history recitation; this particular line is pure ethnic mockery detached from any point on the table, a lapse into the ad hominem pattern rather than the "I've debated your best guys for a decade" argument he makes elsewhere. The remark is a jab based purely on assumed nationality/ethnicity tied to a technical mic problem, bearing on no claim in dispute, backed by nothing specific, and delivered for the crowd's amusement rather than to advance any point with the caller who was present and trying to speak. It fails the relevance and truth tests even though no substantive argument was on the table to be substituted for, which is enough to score it as ad hominem, consistent with the "aim/relevance/truth" prongs.
- Thesmothetes overturn: By the rule: the floor: no opponent present. The transcript shows "What's up, man? Unmute." at 57:59 followed directly by the quoted jab at 58:12 and then "Macy, what's up?" at 58:20 — no caller's words appear anywhere in that stretch. The line is Dyer riffing on a mic/connection that never came through (hence the dial-up joke), not a remark made to or answered by anyone actually on the floor, so under the floor rule it is not judged on either ledger.
Appeal this callout
Appeals come only from the debaters themselves. Sign in with Google to start; you'll then prove which debater you are, once.