Appeal: evidence
From Religion Debate: Islam vs Christianity.
- #108526:36upheld Sam Shamoun epainos: evidence (+2)
The council upheld the call: Sam Shamoun earned 2 points.
“Sahih Muslim, book four, number seventeen fifty seven. Abu Ma'am [Abu Umamah] said he heard all his messengers say, recite the Quran for on the day of resurrection. It will come as an intercessor for those who recite it.” quote corrected
Diogenes: Against Daniel's claim that the Qur'an has no mind of its own, he cites a specific, checkable narration in which the Qur'an and named suras act, plead and intercede.- Aristotle uphold: On the record: Sam declared from the opening that Tawhid is incoherent given claims about the uncreated Qur'an and hadith describing the Qur'an/suras acting independently (interceding, arguing with Allah); this citation at 26:36 is the specific textual support for that very line, first raised in his own opening statement and pressed consistently through several rounds. Sam distinguishes the claim (the Qur'an/suras act as agents that intercede, suggesting separate minds/entities) from evidence for it by naming a specific, checkable source, Sahih Muslim book 4 no. 1757, rather than merely asserting the point; this meets the rubric's bar for "evidence" regardless of whether Daniel's rebuttal (personification, citing parallel biblical verses) is ultimately persuasive.
- Socrates uphold: Read blind, found "evidence". Sam cites a specific, checkable source (Sahih Muslim, book 4, hadith 1757) rather than merely asserting that the Quran is described as interceding, and he uses this cited text as the premise for his subsequent argument that Islamic theology faces an analogous plurality problem to the Trinity. This is exactly the move of grounding a claim in checkable evidence rather than bare assertion.
- Plato uphold: On the record: Sam declared from the opening that the Trinity vs Tawhid framing cuts both ways, and specifically argued that the Qur'an's uncreatedness creates a parallel "multiple minds" problem for Islamic monotheism; this citation is a direct continuation of that line, not a new claim. Sam gives a specific, checkable citation (Sahih Muslim, book 4, #1757) with a quoted narration to support his claim that the Qur'an/suras act independently and intercede, which he uses as evidence for his argument that Daniel's tawhid faces the same "separate mind" problem he's pressing against the Trinity. This is a textbook case of citing checkable evidence rather than bare assertion.
Appeal this callout
Appeals come only from the debaters themselves. Sign in with Google to start; you'll then prove which debater you are, once.