Appeal: explicit argument
From Religion Debate: Islam vs Christianity.
- #11111:00:56upheld Sam Shamoun epainos: explicit argument (+2)
The council upheld the call: Sam Shamoun earned 2 points.
“… the consistent teaching of the Quran and the sound narrations... is that Muhammad confirmed the very scriptures that the Jews and Christians had in their possession at his time... Attack the bible for variations because you show that you know more than Muhammad.”
Diogenes: He states a clean dilemma from his opponent's own authority, with a list of specific Qur'anic references backing the premise, so the argument can be checked and answered rather than merely asserted.- Aristotle uphold: On the record: This is central to S3's stated method of internal critique from the opponent's own authoritative sources, first laid out in his opening statement's shift to scripture, and consistently pressed throughout the debate. Sam states clear premises (Muhammad confirmed the Torah/Injil in circulation, per the Qur'an, citing specific verses like 2:40-44, 3:3-4, 5:43-48, etc.) leading to a checkable conclusion (attacking the Bible's authenticity undermines Muhammad's own claim), giving the opponent something specific to answer.
- Socrates uphold: Read blind, found "explicit argument". Sam lays out a clear premise-to-conclusion internal critique: since the Qur'an and hadith present Muhammad as confirming the very scriptures Jews and Christians held in his time, any Muslim attack on the reliability of those same scriptures implies Muhammad (and Allah) erred or was deceived, undermining Muhammad's prophethood on the questioner's own terms. This is consistent with his stated method of reductio from the opponent's own authoritative sources and is stated plainly rather than left as innuendo.
- Plato uphold: On the record: S3's declared method is internal critique from the opponent's own authoritative sources, and this is his central scripture-authenticity thesis stated since the top of this round: Muhammad affirmed the Bible in his possession, so any Muslim attack on biblical reliability undermines Muhammad's own prophetic claim—supported by a list of specific citable Qur'anic verses. This states plain premises (Muhammad confirmed the Jewish/Christian scriptures of his time; therefore attacking those scriptures undermines Muhammad) and a clear conclusion, backed by specific checkable Qur'anic citations, matching S3's declared internal-critique method throughout the round.
Appeal this callout
Appeals come only from the debaters themselves. Sign in with Google to start; you'll then prove which debater you are, once.