Appeal: misrepresentation
From Religion Debate: Islam vs Christianity.
- #11382:05:03upheld Daniel Haqiqatjou psogos: misrepresentation (+2)
The council upheld the call: Daniel Haqiqatjou gave away 2 points.
“… your champions here did not mention child marriage. Are they dodging that issue? Why didn't Jay or Sam mention child marriage?”
Diogenes: Sam had just argued the age-of-marriage point at length from the Talmud and applied it directly to Muhammad and Aisha in the round immediately preceding, so the claim that neither opponent mentioned child marriage is contradicted by the transcript.- Aristotle uphold: On the record: Daniel's standing comparative strategy throughout the morality round is to challenge Christians on child marriage using canon law/Aquinas; here he claims his opponents avoided the topic entirely, which is contradicted by the transcript rather than a continuation of a principled objection. In the immediately preceding round (approx. 123:00–123:50), Sam explicitly raised the age-of-marriage issue via the Talmud's age-12 standard and applied it directly to Muhammad and Aisha, calling it pedophilia — so Daniel's claim moments later that "Jay or Sam" never mentioned child marriage, and his rhetorical suggestion they were "dodging that issue," is flatly contradicted by the record, satisfying the misrepresentation element; the false premise is then used to launch a substantial rhetorical attack, supporting the major severity.
- Socrates uphold: Read blind, found "misrepresentation". In the immediately preceding round Sam explicitly addressed child marriage at length, arguing that even by the Talmud's own standard (age 12 with signs of maturity) Muhammad's marriage to a nine-year-old at age 54 was pedophilia ("his prophet is condemned to hell... slept with a nine year old minor and sanctioned pedophilia"). The transcript directly contradicts Daniel's claim here that Sam and Jay "did not mention child marriage" and were "dodging that issue."
- Plato uphold: On the record: Daniel's sustained morality-round strategy is parity argument (Islam's practices are no worse than the Bible/Church's own record on marriage age); that strategy is legitimate, but this specific claim that his opponents avoided the topic entirely is a factual misstatement of what the transcript shows they just did. The transcript directly contradicts this claim: in the round immediately preceding (his own words, 122:57–124:00), Sam extensively discussed the age of marriage from the Talmud and applied it explicitly to Muhammad and Aisha ("at the age of 54, he slept with a nine year old minor and sanctioned pedophilia"). Daniel's assertion that "Jay or Sam" never "mentioned" or "addressed" child marriage, made in his very next turn, is flatly false on the record, not a fair characterization of an omission or a narrower reading of what was said.
Appeal this callout
Appeals come only from the debaters themselves. Sign in with Google to start; you'll then prove which debater you are, once.