Appeal: fallacy spotted
From Jay Dyer vs 2 Freemason Christians.
- #121558:23upheld Jay Dyer epainos: fallacy spotted (+1)
The council upheld the call: Jay Dyer earned 1 point.
“So again, this was a rhetorical note. It's not an argument. It's a rhetorical. This is an appeal to the audience fallacy.”
Diogenes: He correctly identifies that the remark was addressed to the room rather than to the question, and Chase had just conceded he was "not making a claim."- Aristotle uphold: On the record: Consistent with S1's sustained practice throughout the debate of calling out inconsistencies and rhetorical moves in his opponents' answers; this is squarely such an instance, correctly locating the fallacy in Chase's own words. The transcript confirms Chase's preceding line was addressed to the audience ("for the sake of the audience... Jay does not believe you're a Christian unless you're orthodox") after disclaiming he was "not making a claim," which is exactly what Jay names — a rhetorical appeal to the room rather than an argument on the point, correctly identifying the fallacy in what the opponent actually said.
- Socrates uphold: Read blind, found "fallacy spotted". Dyer correctly identifies that Geyser's pivot to framing him as "the dogmatist" before the audience, instead of answering the pending question about Masonry's standard of "good," was aimed at winning over listeners rather than continuing the substantive examination — matching the appeal-to-audience/emotion pattern actually present in Geyser's preceding remark.
- Plato uphold: On the record: S1's method throughout includes identifying logical missteps in his opponents' arguments as they occur; this line correctly names the rhetorical move Chase had just made (addressing the audience rather than answering the pending question), which Chase himself had implicitly flagged by saying "I'm not making a claim.". This is a correctly spotted fallacy: Chase's preceding remark was explicitly aimed at swaying the audience rather than answering the live question, and Jay's naming of it as an appeal-to-audience move accurately describes what was actually said.
Appeal this callout
Appeals come only from the debaters themselves. Sign in with Google to start; you'll then prove which debater you are, once.