Appeal: evidence
From Jay Dyer vs 2 Freemason Christians.
- #12461:55:35upheld Ryan Terbibull epainos: evidence (+1)
The council upheld the call: Ryan Terbibull earned 1 point.
“These men have become strong Christians through freemasonry, and I have not seen the opposite. I've not seen a strong Christian man join and then somehow be turned into a Hindu…”
Diogenes: He answers the incompatibility charge by its fruits, stating both what he has observed and what he has not, which is a falsifiable claim of the kind his testimony-based method allows.- Aristotle uphold: On the record: S2's opening method rests on insider testimony as the relevant evidence for what Masonry actually does to its members; this claim is a direct, consistent application of that same standing method, not a new position. Ryan offers a specific, falsifiable observational claim (men strengthened in Christian faith through Masonry, none turned away from it) rather than a bare assertion, which is the kind of checkable insider testimony his stated method relies on throughout the debate.
- Socrates uphold: Read blind, found "evidence". Ryan offers a checkable, honestly-scoped observation ("I have not seen") drawn from his eighteen years in the fraternity, rather than an unqualified universal claim, to counter the "unequally yoked" worry with something more than bare assertion — a track record of men becoming stronger Christians rather than being drawn into other religions.
- Plato uphold: On the record: S2 has held since the opening that Masonry does not function as a rival religion and that lived practice, not outside interpretation of texts, is the correct evidentiary basis for judging it; this claim is a direct application of that standing method. Ryan offers his own observed track record (men becoming stronger Christians through the fraternity, none turned away from Christianity) as evidence against the incompatibility charge, framed as a falsifiable claim about outcomes rather than a bare assertion. This matches his stated method of relying on insider/lived testimony as the relevant evidence for what Masonry actually does to its members.
Appeal this callout
Appeals come only from the debaters themselves. Sign in with Google to start; you'll then prove which debater you are, once.