Appeal: thrasymachus blush
From Jay Dyer vs Pastor P Debate Orthodoxy vs Protestantism, Sola Scriptura and Church History.
- #13591:02:09overturned Jay Dyer against Pastor P agonisma: thrasymachus blush
The council overturned the call, so no points were earned.
“I just want to to note that he said logical fallacies don't matter. Quote. That's that's the surrendering of the debate. I would just want that on record.”
Diogenes: Asked whether he understands what a logical fallacy is after a series of them had been identified, Pastor P answers "Doesn't matter" and falls back on his slogan about not lifting the church above the word of God; he stops contesting the reasoning and the exchange ends there, with the host changing the subject.- Aristotle overturn: On the record: Pastor P's recurring stock dismissal ("doesn't matter") appears repeatedly throughout the debate as a way of waving off challenges while still holding his ground ("I'm not gonna lift the church up above the word of god. Can't can't do it"), and the verified transcript confirms he keeps actively arguing for four more minutes afterward until the debate ends by mutual agreement between both debaters, not by his withdrawal. Thrasymachus blush requires the refuted man to stop arguing, change the subject for good, or leave, and the verified check confirms Pastor P did none of these — he immediately continued asserting his position and kept arguing for several more minutes on Bible translations and arbitrariness. The quoted line is Jay's own rhetorical characterization of surrender ("that's the surrendering of the debate"), not a withdrawal the transcript actually shows, so no decisive move of this or any other duel category occurred at this moment.
- Socrates overturn: Read blind, found nothing worth calling. Jay's declaration follows directly on Pastor P's own "Doesn't matter" in response to being asked if he understands what a logical fallacy is, so the characterization is grounded in something actually said, not invented; and it comes after Jay had already spent many exchanges laying out the specific fallacies (already credited elsewhere). Like the Euthyphro exemplar, this is a rhetorical flourish attached to a completed line of argument rather than a substitute for one, and it names no specific fallacy in what Pastor P said — so it scores on neither ledger.
- Plato overturn: On the record: Pastor P's standing posture (word of God over church) is exactly what he restates immediately after the "doesn't matter" line, and he continues defending and elaborating that position for the remainder of the debate rather than stopping or leaving, so no withdrawal-after-refutation occurred here. Thrasymachus blush requires the refuted man to actually stop arguing, change the subject for good, or leave. The transcript shows the opposite: Pastor P's "doesn't matter" at 61:31 is his familiar stock dismissal used repeatedly throughout the debate (45:27, 46:57), and he immediately follows it with a substantive restatement of his position ("I'm not gonna lift the church up above the word of god"), then keeps actively engaging new questions from the moderator and callers for many more minutes until the debate ends by mutual agreement between both debaters — not because Pastor P withdrew. Jay's line at 62:09 is his own rhetorical claim of surrender, made after the moderator had already redirected to a new topic; it characterizes the moment but the record does not bear out an actual withdrawal.
Appeal this callout
Appeals come only from the debaters themselves. Sign in with Google to start; you'll then prove which debater you are, once.