Appeal: concession
From Jay Dyer vs Styx Debate Abortion – Pro-Life vs Government Overreach.
- #14070:08overturned Styxhexenhammer666 epainos: concession (+1)
The council overturned the call, so no points were earned.
“As far as federal funding, though, it's okay if that gets rescinded. The states and private groups will step in. I don't real I don't want people who are hyper religious to have to pay for abortion because they think that it's wrong.”
Diogenes: Though pro-choice, he grants the opposing side's conscience objection to compelled funding and offers to bear the cost himself, conceding ground rather than defending the whole package.- Aristotle overturn: On the record: S0 declared at the very opening that he is pro-choice but content to see federal funding rescinded so religious objectors aren't forced to fund it, offering to cover the cost himself; this exact framework is what the quoted line states, and he holds it unchanged for the rest of the debate. This quote is from S0's opening statement (00:00-00:28), delivered before Jay Dyer has spoken a single word. A "concession" requires conceding a point after being shown wrong by an opponent; here there is no prior opposing argument on the floor to concede to. This is simply S0's own stated framework from the outset, held consistently throughout: pro-choice personally, but willing to let federal funding lapse and pay extra himself out of libertarian/conscience-based reasoning, which he repeats near the end when discussing willingness to pay. It is not a concession but the standing position of record.
- Socrates uphold: Read blind, found "explicit argument", on the same ledger as the callout. S0 states a clear premise (nobody should be compelled to fund what they sincerely believe immoral) and draws a plain conclusion (federal funding should be rescinded, with states/private groups filling the gap), even offering to personally bear the cost instead. This is a straightforward, charitably-stated position rather than any fault; S2 engages it directly at 00:44 rather than it going unanswered.
- Plato overturn: On the record: S0's opening declared position (00:00-00:28) explicitly includes willingness to see federal funding rescinded and to personally pay extra so religious objectors aren't compelled to fund abortion; the quoted line is that very opening statement, not a shift made after being shown wrong. A concession requires a real prior claim that is then given up when the speaker is shown wrong. This quote is part of S0's very first utterance opening the debate (00:00-00:28), stating his position from the outset, not a retreat from an earlier stance under pressure from S2. It is a position of record, not a concession to it.
- Thesmothetes leave: The quoted words are S0's opening statement (00:00-00:28), delivered before Jay Dyer has spoken at all; there is no prior opposing claim S0 was "shown wrong" on, which the definition of concession requires. All three judges agree the label doesn't hold as a concession — Socrates' own blind read independently landed on "explicit argument," not concession — so even the upholding vote does not actually endorse the callout as made. This is decided by the plain definition of concession against the timeline, not a matter of competing judgment to be left.
Appeal this callout
Appeals come only from the debaters themselves. Sign in with Google to start; you'll then prove which debater you are, once.