Appeal: direct answer
From Jay Dyer vs Pedro from Crucible Debate: Sola Scriptura and Protestantism.
- #15021:25:50upheld Jay Dyer epainos: direct answer (+2)
The council upheld the call: Jay Dyer earned 2 points.
“… he said can you produce any oral tradition that would be in accord with what Paul wrote to the Thessalonians in second Thessalonians two fifteen about the oral tradition. Yeah, I would be happy to, it's called the Church of Thessaloniki, the Orthodox Church in Thessaloniki is the same Orthodox Church that Paul wrote to in Thessalonians…”
Diogenes: He returns to the precise burden Pedro set in his opening — produce something of credible historical pedigree linking the Thessalonians then to believers now — and answers it with a named continuous church and episcopal succession rather than leaving the challenge unmet.- Aristotle uphold: On the record: Jay Dyer has held since the opening that continuity with the apostolic church, evidenced by historical succession, is the test of a rule of faith, and this answer is a direct application of that same framework to the specific burden Pedro set, not a departure from it. Pedro's opening explicitly set the burden: "The onus is on our opponents to produce something of credible historical pedigree that teaches what the Thessalonians believed back then is what they believe now." In his closing, Jay directly meets that named burden with a concrete, checkable answer — a continuously existing named church body (Thessaloniki) with claimed episcopal succession — rather than deflecting or ignoring the challenge.
- Socrates uphold: Read blind, found "evidence", on the same ledger as the callout. Pedro's opening had thrown down a specific challenge: produce something of "credible historical pedigree" showing continuity of belief with the Thessalonians of Paul's day. Jay answers with a concrete, checkable referent, the historic see and succession of bishops of the Church of Thessaloniki, rather than a bare assertion, naming a mechanism (institutional/liturgical continuity) by which the claim could in principle be verified.
- Plato uphold: On the record: S1's framework, declared at the opening, rests on continuity with the apostolic church as the test of a rule of faith, and this line directly answers Pedro's own opening-stated burden (to "produce something of credible historical pedigree" linking the Thessalonians then to believers now) by naming the continuous, historically-attested Church of Thessaloniki. Pedro set this specific burden in his own opening statement, and Jay meets it head-on with a named, checkable entity rather than leaving it unaddressed, which is consistent with his framework held since the opening rather than a new or evasive move.
Appeal this callout
Appeals come only from the debaters themselves. Sign in with Google to start; you'll then prove which debater you are, once.