Appeal: explicit argument
From Jay Dyer vs Pedro from Crucible Debate: Sola Scriptura and Protestantism.
- #15071:33:48upheld Jay Dyer epainos: explicit argument (+1)
The council upheld the call: Jay Dyer earned 1 point.
“To say that the church loses its fundamental constitution, power, and spirit, would be to essentially say that Christ's incarnation does not achieve its effect, and Christ is now divided, and a Nestorian ecclesiology is the result.”
Diogenes: He states the metaphysical core of his case as an argument rather than an assertion: the Church is theanthropic as the body of the God-man, so a failed Church entails a divided Christ, and the charge of Nestorianism follows from that premise rather than standing alone as abuse.- Aristotle uphold: On the record: Jay has held since his opening that the Church is the visible, Spirit-indwelt body of Christ inseparable from Christ's own nature, and this argument is a direct application of that standing metaphysical claim to rebut Pedro's view of a fallible/failed church. The quote lays out a clear premise-conclusion structure grounded in Jay's stated metaphysics (the Church as the theanthropic body of Christ): if the Church as a historical institution failed doctrinally/spiritually, that failure would imply Christ's incarnational effect is undone and Christ divided, from which the "Nestorian" charge follows as a conclusion rather than a bare insult. This is consistent with the Orthodox ecclesiology Jay declared and defended throughout, not a new or inconsistent move.
- Socrates uphold: Read blind, found "explicit argument". Jay lays out a plain premise-to-conclusion chain: the church is the theanthropic body of Christ per Paul; if that body could lose its constitutive power and spirit, the incarnation's effect would fail and Christ would be divided from his body, which he labels a Nestorian ecclesiology. Whether or not one accepts the premise, this is a stated deductive argument rather than mere assertion, and it is consistent with his recurring Christology-ecclesiology linkage made elsewhere in the debate (e.g., his remark that Reformed Christology tends toward Nestorianism).
- Plato uphold: On the record: Jay declared at the opening an Orthodox ecclesiology holding the Church as the visible body of Christ and locus of the Spirit that never left; this line is a direct, premise-conclusion elaboration of that same standing claim, used against Pedro's "church failed" framing from cross-examination. The quote lays out a clear premise (the Church is the theanthropic body of the incarnate Christ) and a conclusion (a "failed" Church entails a divided Christ, i.e., Nestorian ecclesiology), meeting the bar for an explicit argument rather than a bare insult.
Appeal this callout
Appeals come only from the debaters themselves. Sign in with Google to start; you'll then prove which debater you are, once.