Appeal: evidence
From Jay Dyer vs Styx Debate Abortion – Pro-Life vs Government Overreach.
- #154521:00upheld Jay Dyer epainos: evidence (+2)
The council upheld the call: Jay Dyer earned 2 points.
“You can read about this in David Rockefeller's memoirs. He brags about it. You can read about it in Horowitz and Colliers' authorized biography of the Rockefellers.”
Diogenes: Against Styx's claim that Roe reached the court because ordinary people cared, Jay distinguishes his claim from its support and names specific, checkable documents rather than asserting the engineering thesis bare.- Aristotle uphold: On the record: Jay Dyer has held since early in the debate that abortion's rise is entangled with elite social-engineering efforts (Rockefeller/CFR/Planned Parenthood funding), and this citation is a continuation of that same claim, not a new or shifted one. Jay's opening framework explicitly includes a genealogical claim that abortion promotion traces to Rockefeller/CFR social engineering (stated at 00:59-01:10 and expanded at 20:44-21:09). Here he distinguishes the bare assertion from checkable support by naming two specific, real texts, and the verifier confirms both exist, are correctly characterized in substance, and do bear on the narrower claim he is making (that Rockefeller himself boasts of exactly this kind of organized influence-building). This is a textbook citation of checkable evidence rather than a bare assertion, consistent with the case he has held throughout the debate.
- Socrates uphold: Read blind, found "evidence". Jay backs his claim that Rockefeller influence drove the abortion debate by citing specific, checkable sources by name (David Rockefeller's memoirs, Horowitz and Collier's authorized Rockefeller biography), distinguishing the assertion from mere claim-making.
- Plato uphold: On the record: Jay declared at the opening that abortion is not isolated but tied to verifiable large-scale social-engineering programs (citing the Berelson memo), and here he continues that same line by naming further checkable sources rather than departing from it. Jay's opening framework included a genealogical critique of the abortion movement's origins (social engineering, Rockefeller/Planned Parenthood links), a claim he had already raised earlier via the Bernard Berelson memo. Here, pressed by Styx's claim that Roe reflected genuine popular concern, Jay names two specific, checkable texts (Rockefeller's Memoirs, the Collier/Horowitz biography) as sources for the narrower claim that the Rockefeller network itself acknowledged this influence-building. The verifier confirms these sources are real and do bear that narrower claim, even if the larger causal thesis about Roe remains contested. This is a citation of checkable evidence distinguished from the bare assertion, consistent with his standing position.
Appeal this callout
Appeals come only from the debaters themselves. Sign in with Google to start; you'll then prove which debater you are, once.