Appeal: evidence
From Jay Dyer vs Pedro from Crucible Debate: Sola Scriptura and Protestantism.
- #155126:47upheld Jay Dyer epainos: evidence (+2)
The council upheld the call: Jay Dyer earned 2 points.
“… second Chronicles 29 explicitly is noting that the liturgical worship of Hezekiah is organized according to the tradition and not according to what we know as written.”
Diogenes: Jay separates his claim from a specific checkable text and turns it against Pedro's own confessional regulative principle of worship, rather than asserting the primacy of oral tradition bare.- Aristotle uphold: On the record: Jay Dyer has held since his opening that the word of God is both written and oral, and that oral/traditional authority operated even in periods with written scripture; this citation of 2 Chron 29 is a specific, checkable textual instance offered in service of that standing position, and the verifier confirms the text supports the reading given. This is a citation of a specific, checkable historical text distinguished from bare assertion, and it is used argumentatively to press Pedro's own regulative-principle commitments — squarely meeting the definition of "evidence." The verifier confirms the text bears the reading given, so the call stands as major.
- Socrates uphold: Read blind, found "evidence". Dyer cites a specific, checkable text (2 Chronicles 29, the account of Hezekiah organizing temple worship) as evidence for his broader premise that authoritative liturgical practice in the Old Testament rested on tradition rather than an explicit written mandate, feeding his larger argument that the 'word of God' includes oral as well as written transmission. This is exactly the move of distinguishing a claim from a checkable citation, not a bare assertion.
- Plato uphold: On the record: Jay Dyer's opening and sustained position is that the word of God is both written and oral and that oral tradition/liturgy is authoritative alongside scripture; this citation is a direct instantiation of that thesis with a specific checkable text, not a departure from his record. Jay cited a specific, checkable text (2 Chron 29, with the actual verse content about David/Gad/Nathan's commandment underlying the liturgical arrangement) to support his framework claim that oral/prophetic tradition, not written Mosaic text, organized Hezekiah's worship - and used it pointedly against Pedro's own regulative-principle-of-worship commitment. The verifier confirms the text supports the reading. This is a clean instance of citing checkable evidence for an argument already on record (oral tradition as authoritative word of God, stated in his opening).
Appeal this callout
Appeals come only from the debaters themselves. Sign in with Google to start; you'll then prove which debater you are, once.