Appeal: clarification
From @deanwithrs Gets DESTROYED In Heated Debate On God Then RUNS.
- #19256:23upheld Dean Withers epainos: clarification (+1)
The council upheld the call: Dean Withers earned 1 point.
“What do you mean by universal?”
Diogenes: He asks for the terms of the host's transcendental checklist to be defined before granting them, then answers each one directly once it is defined.- Aristotle uphold: On the record: S1's analytic-epistemology method has consistently demanded precise definitions of terms before conceding predicates of logic (seen also with "ontological status," "invariant," "concept" throughout); asking "what do you mean by universal?" before answering is a continuation of that stance, not a departure, and he does answer once given the definition. The transcript shows S0 asked "is logic universal?", S1 requested clarification of the term, S0 supplied one ("applies everywhere"), and S1 then directly answered "yes" — this is a textbook clarification move, not a stall, since the answer followed immediately.
- Socrates uphold: Read blind, found "clarification". "Universal" is genuinely ambiguous here (it could mean "applies to every case" or invoke the metaphysical category of a universal, which is directly relevant to the Platonism being discussed); Dean asks what is meant before answering, and once S0 clarifies ("applies everywhere") he answers directly, "Yes."
- Plato uphold: On the record: Dean's method throughout is to press for precise definitions of terms (justification, concept, possession, etc.) before conceding or denying claims about them; asking "what do you mean by universal?" before answering is consistent with that consistently-held approach, not a new or contradictory move. S0 asks a series of predicate questions about logic (universal, invariant); S1 requests the term be defined and then answers directly ("Yes") once it is — a textbook clarification followed by a direct answer, not evasion.
Appeal this callout
Appeals come only from the debaters themselves. Sign in with Google to start; you'll then prove which debater you are, once.