Appeal: evidence
From Jay Dyer vs Pastor P Debate Orthodoxy vs Protestantism, Sola Scriptura and Church History.
- #19741:30:37upheld Jay Dyer epainos: evidence (+1)
The council upheld the call: Jay Dyer earned 1 point.
“If you look up the Dura Europa [Europos] Synagogue, which is an early synagogue, it's actually mentioned in the orthodox liturgy book by…” quote corrected
Diogenes: He finally backs the liturgy-from-synagogue claim with a specific site and a scholarly source that can be checked.- Aristotle uphold: On the record: Jay Dyer's declared method throughout is to ground his tradition-based claims in citable historical and scholarly sources rather than bare assertion (as with MacDonald on the Deuterocanon, Irenaeus on apostolic succession, the Byzantine identity of the received text); this line is a continuation of that same standing method. Jay names a specific, real archaeological site (the Dura-Europos synagogue) and a specific, real scholarly work by a named Oxford-affiliated author, which is exactly the kind of checkable citation the "evidence" label requires; the verifier's finding is "not found" (inconclusive) rather than "unsupported or misread," and per the rubric a contested-or-not-found check is judged on the merits without it — on the merits, this is a genuine citation, not a bare assertion.
- Socrates uphold: Read blind, found "evidence". Rather than merely repeating his claim that early Christian liturgy grew out of temple and synagogue worship, Jay points to a specific, checkable archaeological example - the Dura Europos synagogue (2nd-3rd century), naming the scholarly source discussing it - and notes its wall imagery resembles Orthodox church decoration, which is the kind of concrete citation that can be looked up and checked rather than a bare assertion.
- Plato uphold: On the record: Jay Dyer's opening and running argument was that apostolic liturgical worship derives historically from temple and synagogue practice, a claim he had so far supported mainly by asserting "every scholar" agrees; this line is consistent with, and strengthens, that same standing claim by finally naming a specific scholar, book, and archaeological site. Jay names a specific author (Hugh Wybrew), his institutional affiliation, a specific book on Orthodox liturgical history, and a specific dated archaeological site (the Dura-Europos synagogue) with a concrete, falsifiable description — this is exactly the kind of checkable citation that distinguishes evidence from bare assertion, regardless of whether the verifier could independently confirm the book's contents; the verification rubric directs judging the call on its own merits when a check is inconclusive.
Appeal this callout
Appeals come only from the debaters themselves. Sign in with Google to start; you'll then prove which debater you are, once.