Appeal: false claim
From HEATED Debate w/ Feminists. Wage Gap, Pro Choice ft. @MikeRashidOfficial.
- #198932:29upheld Myron Gaines claim: false claim (+1)
The council upheld the finding: Myron Gaines gave away 1 point on Alētheia, the tally of checked facts.
The claim, as Thucydides noted it: There are studies showing that women don't know what they want.
Diogenes: Thucydides (verifier): unsupported. At 51:48 Myron Gaines asserts "there's actually studies that show that women don't know what they want," but names no study, author, or publication, and none is ever produced anywhere in the transcript despite the claim recurring several times (e.g., 104:33, 107:02, 141:20). Another participant, Isla, explicitly calls this out at 130:42, saying she does not know where his "studies" come from, suggesting "misogynistic.com," and no citation is ever supplied in response. With no identifiable source at all, the claim cannot be checked against any text and stands unsupported.- Aristotle uphold: On the record: Myron's declared method throughout is to present his claims as fact-based and studies-backed rather than opinion, but this particular claim is never cited despite being repeated four times and explicitly challenged, so the line is consistent with his rhetorical habit but unsupported as fact. Myron repeats "there are studies" at 51:48, 104:33, 107:02, and 141:20 across the debate, never once naming an author, publication, or figure for this specific "women don't know what they want" claim, and when directly pressed by Isla at 130:42 ("where are you getting these debts?... misogynistic.com") he does not supply one, instead deflecting to a different topic (the wage gap) and later promising unspecified links "in the description" after the show ends — which is outside the debate itself and unverifiable from the transcript. The finding of "unsupported" holds against the whole record.
- Socrates uphold: Read blind, found "appeal to authority", on the same ledger as the callout. Myron asserts "there are studies showing that women don't know what they want" as though it settles the point, but names no study, author, or specific finding — a bare gesture to unspecified authority rather than evidence, the same move he repeats later almost verbatim at 51:48.
- Plato uphold: On the record: Myron's declared framework throughout is that he argues from "facts" and "studies" rather than feelings, repeatedly invoking unnamed research to back sweeping claims about women; this specific claim ("studies show women don't know what they want") is one of those invocations, recurring later (104:33, 107:02, 141:20) without ever being sourced, and Isla directly challenges the sourcing at 130:42 with no citation given in reply. The verifier's finding holds against the whole transcript: no study, author, or publication is ever named for this specific claim despite it recurring multiple times and being explicitly challenged once, and no citation is supplied in response anywhere in the debate — the claim stands unsupported on the record as read.
Appeal this callout
Appeals come only from the debaters themselves. Sign in with Google to start; you'll then prove which debater you are, once.