Appeal: self-contradiction
From HEATED Debate w/ Feminists. Wage Gap, Pro Choice ft. @MikeRashidOfficial.
- #20211:55:17upheld Myron Gaines psogos: self-contradiction (+1) tempered from major to minor
The council upheld the call: Myron Gaines gave away 1 point.
“We never said all. We said We said most. Like, we're speaking on a balance of probability.”
Diogenes: The record contradicts this. Myron said "Every single time a guy is in a friend zone with you", "Women always want to be treated...", "women want men that other women want, period", and "we don't give a fuck about your careers". His claim that he "never said all" disowns those absolutes without acknowledging them.Herodotus (yes): The site's own ledger shows this is not a first offense: across 2 prior debates here, Myron Gaines has already had a motte-and-bailey fault upheld once, alongside hasty generalisation x2, ad hominem x3, appeal to authority x2 and appeal to popularity x1 — i.e., a documented pattern of asserting sweeping claims and then retreating to a softer "most/balance of probability" framing when pressed, exactly the move flagged in this callout. External coverage of his other public debates (Ohio State, USC, Michigan Daily, UCF) independently describes the same style: interlocutors and reporters characterize his approach as inflammatory generalization rather than concession-tracking dialogue, though none of those pieces document this specific "we never said all" line verbatim. Given the site's own upheld precedent for the identical fault type, the accusation is well warranted and should weigh against leniency rather than for it. Sources: https://www.michigandaily.com/news/podcast-influencer-myron-gaines-debates-students-spreads-antisemitism-misogyny-and-racism/ https://www.dailygamecock.com/article/2026/02/uncensored-america-hosts-debate-event-with-conservative-influencer-myron-gaines-news-fowler https://www.hercampus.com/school/ucf/hate-disguised-as-debate-why-myron-gaines-campus-tour-demands-a-real-response/
- Aristotle uphold: On the record: Myron's declared method throughout is to frame generalizations as "balance of probability" rather than absolutes, but the record shows him repeatedly using unqualified absolute language ("every single time," "period," "it's a lie," "women always want to be...") without hedging; this line denies that pattern rather than acknowledging it. The transcript itself (not the external material) bears this out: at 87:47 "Every single time a guy is in a friend zone... it's a lie," at 48:47 "women always want to be treated like traditional ladies," at 87:07 "Women want men that other women want, period," and at 112:32 "we don't give a fuck about your careers" are all unqualified absolutes with no "most" or probability hedge, directly contradicting his claim here that he "never said all."
- Socrates uphold: Read blind, found "self-contradiction". Confronted with Isla's charge of speaking in absolutes, Myron denies it — "we never said all, we said most" — but the transcript shows him repeatedly using unqualified absolute language throughout the debate ("looks come first... period," "every single time a guy is in a friend zone... she's going to lose respect... 100%," "it's a lie," "biologically proven"); he revises his own record rather than acknowledging the pattern just pointed out.
- Plato uphold: On the record: Myron's declared framework throughout is to claim he speaks only in measured, probability-based "facts," but the record shows him repeatedly using unqualified absolutes when making his sweeping claims; his retreat here to "we said most" without acknowledging those absolutes is a real, verified departure from the record rather than an accurate restatement of what he actually said. The verifier confirms multiple prior unhedged absolutes from Myron himself — "It's a lie. Every single time," "women always want to be treated...," "period," "we don't give a fuck about your careers" — directly contradicted by his claim here that "we never said all... we said most." This is an unacknowledged contradiction of his own recorded statements, squarely fitting self-contradiction.
Appeal this callout
Appeals come only from the debaters themselves. Sign in with Google to start; you'll then prove which debater you are, once.