Appeal: distinction
From HEATED Debate w/ Feminists. Wage Gap, Pro Choice ft. @MikeRashidOfficial.
- #20672:51:05upheld Penelope epainos: distinction (+1)
The council upheld the call: Penelope earned 1 point.
“They're not trying to smash me every time I meet up with them, they're not trying to get me drunk and have sex, they're not taking me on dates.”
Diogenes: Penelope grants that most of her male friends might be attracted to her ("95% of them probably would"), then separates latent attraction from how the friendship is actually conducted, which is nonsexual. That lets her keep her claim that the friendships are platonic while conceding the part of Myron's view that is true.- Aristotle uphold: On the record: Penelope's position has been consistent since her first extended turn (the thirteen-year-friend story) that value-based, non-sexual friendships are real and are defined by conduct; this line is a direct restatement/application of that framework, not a new concession or departure from it. Penelope's declared framework is that a man's intentions show in his conduct, not only in latent attraction; this line applies that exact distinction, separating whether her friends might be attracted to her from whether they actually act on it (getting her drunk, pursuing dates, pushing sex), and uses that to preserve her platonic-friendship claim while not denying possible latent interest.
- Socrates uphold: Read blind, found "evidence", on the same ledger as the callout. Against Myron's claim that her male friends aren't really platonic because they'd sleep with her given the chance, Penelope points to specific, observable conduct — no seduction attempts, no getting her drunk, no dates — as the checkable basis for calling the friendships genuinely platonic, consistent with her stated view that intentions show in conduct rather than latent attraction alone.
- Plato uphold: On the record: Penelope's position of record from the opening is that "a man's intentions show in his conduct, not only in latent attraction," and this line is a direct, undiluted restatement of exactly that first principle in response to Myron's pressure, not a new move. This draws a genuine distinction (latent attraction vs. actual conduct) that does real work against Myron's claim that any attraction disqualifies a friendship from being platonic, and it is consistent with, not a departure from, her declared framework since the opening.
Appeal this callout
Appeals come only from the debaters themselves. Sign in with Google to start; you'll then prove which debater you are, once.