Appeal: peritrope
From HEATED Debate w/ Feminists. Wage Gap, Pro Choice ft. @MikeRashidOfficial.
- #20732:59:03upheld Kimberly against Myron Gaines agonisma: peritrope (+3)
The council upheld the call: Kimberly earned 3.6 points.
“But you say you know how females think though. You did say that.”
Diogenes: Myron had disqualified Isla's view of male dating on the ground that she is not a man ("Are you a man? No"). He has also just said he is "not friends with females". Kimberly turns his own standard on him: by that rule he cannot claim to "know how women think" either ("How do you know how we think? You're not a woman"). Myron answers only "Yeah. Yeah."; Fresh steps in with an appeal to how hard men work to understand women, which does not meet the standard Myron set.- Aristotle uphold: On the record: Myron's declared and repeatedly-invoked standard throughout the debate is that lacking the relevant experience disqualifies one's claims about that group's inner life; Kimberly's line applies that same standard to him, producing a self-refutation of his claim to know how women think, which is the peritrope move rather than a mere restated objection. Myron had established and repeatedly used the standard that outsider status disqualifies authoritative claims about a group's experience (most explicitly at 113:06, "Are you a man? ... Have you ever dated a woman as a man?"). Kimberly applies that exact standard back onto Myron's own claim to "know how females think," and by his own rule he cannot know since he is not a woman. Myron's response ("Yeah. Yeah.") is not a defense, and Fresh has to step in with a different, non-responsive line, showing the move landed rather than being answered.
- Socrates uphold: Read blind, found "fallacy spotted", on the same ledger as the callout. Myron had just said, moments earlier, "I know how men think and I know how women think, don't give your attention to women for free platonically" (177:40), and is now arguing women can't be platonic friends because they aren't equipped to understand masculine problems, implying an unbridgeable gap. Kimberly catches the tension directly from his own words — if the gap between the sexes is as he describes, his own claimed expertise on "how females think" is undercut — grounding her challenge precisely in what he actually said rather than in a caricature of it.
- Plato uphold: On the record: Myron's declared framework throughout the debate includes claiming privileged, identity-based knowledge of the opposite sex (he disqualified Isla's view of male dating on the ground she's "not a man," and elsewhere casts himself as "the hunter" who "must understand the prey"); Kimberly applies that same identity-based standard back on him. Myron has repeatedly claimed epistemic authority over female psychology while earlier disqualifying a woman's claim to speak on male psychology on the ground she isn't a man; Kimberly turns that identical standard back on him ("You're not a woman... how do you know how we think"), and his only response is a bare "Yeah, yeah" before Fresh has to rescue him with a different, weaker justification — a genuine self-refuting turnabout.
Appeal this callout
Appeals come only from the debaters themselves. Sign in with Google to start; you'll then prove which debater you are, once.