Appeal: false claim
From HEATED Debate w/ Feminists. Wage Gap, Pro Choice ft. @MikeRashidOfficial.
- #20862:21upheld Myron Gaines claim: false claim (+1)
The council upheld the finding: Myron Gaines gave away 1 point on Alētheia, the tally of checked facts.
The claim, as Thucydides noted it: Anecdotal evidence and studies show that when a woman rises through the ranks in her career and has children, her priorities shift toward her children over her career.
Diogenes: Thucydides (verifier): unsupported. Myron names no study and no researcher; "anecdotal evidence and studies" is asserted without a citable reference, so there is no source to open and test the specific claim against. The nearest real literature (Pew 2015) shows women more often adjust careers for family reasons than men do, but that is a claim about career adjustment generally, not the specific narrative that priorities shift toward children as a woman "rises through the ranks," so it does not squarely confirm what was asserted. With no named source and no literature that matches the claim as stated, the claim is unsupported.- Aristotle uphold: On the record: Myron's declared method throughout is to present his generalizations about sex, dating, and career/family tradeoffs as "fact-based" and "studies show" rather than opinion, repeatedly invoking unnamed studies without citation; this claim is a straightforward continuation of that same pattern already found unsupported at many other points in the debate (e.g. 32:29, 87:46, 107:05, 123:47, 141:16, 142:15). Thucydides's check finds no named study or researcher behind "anecdotal evidence and studies," and the nearest real literature (Pew 2015) supports a broader claim about career adjustment for family reasons, not the specific narrative that priorities shift toward children specifically as a woman "rises through the ranks"; the claim as stated is therefore unsupported, and nothing in the transcript shows Myron correcting or narrowing it himself.
- Socrates uphold: Read blind, found "appeal to authority", on the same ledger as the callout. Myron backs his claim about women's priorities shifting after children with "anecdotal and also shown in the studies" — but as with his other invocations of unnamed "studies" or "biology" throughout the debate, he names no study, author, or specific finding, so the phrase functions as a bare gesture at authority rather than a checkable citation.
- Plato uphold: On the record: Myron's declared framework since the opening is that he argues from "facts" and studies rather than feelings, and this bench has repeatedly found that framework cashing out as unsourced assertion whenever tested (e.g. the Tinder-study and "88%" lines); this line is a straightforward continuation of that same pattern rather than a departure requiring separate treatment. This is Myron's familiar move throughout the debate: invoking unnamed "studies" as a stand-in for a citable source. Here, as elsewhere on this record (e.g. "studies show women don't know what they want," "88% of men rated unattractive"), no researcher or study is named, and the nearest matching real literature (Pew 2015) supports only a broader, weaker claim about career adjustment generally, not the specific "rises through the ranks / priorities shift to children" narrative asserted. The claim is unsupported as stated.
Appeal this callout
Appeals come only from the debaters themselves. Sign in with Google to start; you'll then prove which debater you are, once.