Appeal: homologia
From DEBATE: Jay Dyer Vs Pastor Jonathan Shelley | Tradition Vs Sola Scriptura.
- #23021:08:57upheld Jay Dyer against Jonathan Shelley agonisma: homologia (+1)
The council upheld the call: Jay Dyer earned 1.2 points.
“How do you know that Matthew the apostle wrote it?”
Diogenes: After Shelley agreed that apostolic authorship is a point of evidence, Jay got him to say Matthew's authorship is known because "it was passed down... through tradition." That grants that even Shelley's knowledge of what the canonical books are rests in part on church tradition. Shelley limits it by saying traditions must be tested by Scripture, so Jay's "you just ended the debate" overreaches.- Aristotle uphold: On the record: Dyer opened by declaring that Scripture points beyond the text to oral tradition and that Shelley has no basis for the Protestant canon, and he has held that throughout; this line presses the canon challenge and does not depart from it. Dyer asked how Shelley knows Matthew wrote Matthew, and Shelley granted that authorship is evidence. He then said it was "passed down... through tradition." That is a forced concession: his knowledge of the authorship of a canonical book rests on tradition. Shelley limits it by saying traditions must be tested by Scripture, so "you just ended the debate" overreaches. The concession itself still stands, so homologia fits.
- Socrates overturn: Read blind, found nothing worth calling. Jay asks a fair, pointed question that follows Shelley's admission that apostolic authorship matters as evidence. It is a genuine request for grounds, tied to the live canon dispute. It asserts nothing fallacious, and the 'Thank you, you just ended the debate' overreach comes later.
- Plato uphold: On the record: Dyer declared at the opening that Scripture points beyond itself to oral tradition and that Shelley has no basis for the Protestant canon, and he has pressed that canon challenge throughout; this line is the question that draws out the concession, so it does not depart from that position. Dyer's question led Shelley to say Matthew's authorship was "passed down... through tradition." That is a real concession, and Shelley did not take it back. He limited it by saying traditions are tested against Scripture, so Dyer's claim that this "ended the debate" overreaches. Still, the exchange is a genuine forced concession on a point central to the canon challenge.
- Thesmothetes uphold: By the rule: every element of the label is found in the record. At 68:42 Shelley agreed that apostolic authorship of Matthew is a point of evidence. Jay then asked how he knows Matthew wrote it, and Shelley answered that it "was passed down... through tradition" (68:57). He did not take that back. At 69:08 he said he had "never said that tradition's wrong," and at 69:21 he only limited it by testing traditions against Scripture. That is a concession forced by a question, which is what homologia names. Jay's "you just ended the debate" overreaches, but the concession itself stands, so the call is upheld with homologia as the category.
Appeal this callout
Appeals come only from the debaters themselves. Sign in with Google to start; you'll then prove which debater you are, once.