Appeal: false dilemma
From Ryad TRIGGERS Miami Girls After Saying THIS... 2026-10-19 22:20.
- #26191:20:38upheld a speaker not yet confirmed psogos: false dilemma (+2)
The council upheld the call: a speaker not yet confirmed gave away 2 points.
“… annoying to deal with, she doesn't know how to mate select, or she was combative and never respected authority in the first place which is why she's single…”
Diogenes: He lists three faults of the woman as the only reasons a woman over 30 is single, though women at the table had named others (widowhood, an abusive past, career focus, not being ready), and his conclusion that she is a red flag needs those three to be all there are.major: He sets aside several live options named on the floor, and the red-flag conclusion depends on the list being complete.
- Aristotle overturn: On the record: The speaker (the transcript's S30 here is the same voice as S22/S1, who opened by defending Islamic practice as obedience to God's command and has held that men lead and women should be submissive) has held that a woman single past 30 shows poor judgment, and this line restates that view. The speaker had just said "if I see a girl over 30 or 33, and I can tell she hasn't been able to hold the relationship". The three options are explicitly conditioned on that. They are not offered as the only reasons any woman is single. Women at the table did name widowhood and abuse, but he answered those separately ("that's just her side of the story"). The elements of false dilemma, that he presents the options as the only ones and his conclusion needs them to be exhaustive, are not clearly met. At best this is a toss-up, so the call is overturned.
- Socrates uphold: Read blind, found "false dilemma". S22/S30 lists three flaws as the only explanations for a woman being single past 30 and says "which is why she's single". Other options were live on the floor: widowhood, abuse and trauma, a long relationship that ended, career focus, not being ready. S23, S34, S26 and S21 had just named them. His red-flag conclusion needs the list to be exhaustive, and it is not.
- Plato uphold: On the record: S30 declared nothing at the opening, where S1 spoke; the voice at 79:46-80:47 continues the men's-side line that women should be submissive and accountable, and this line applies that stance to why a single woman over 30 is a red flag. He says "She's either incredibly annoying to deal with, she doesn't know how to mate select, or she was combative and never respected authority" and uses those three as the reasons she is single. Women at the table had already named others: widowhood, abuse and trauma, career focus, not being ready. Some of these he brushed off as "just her side of the story". His conclusion that she is a red flag needs the three to be exhaustive, and the other options were live on the floor. The elements are met.
Appeal this callout
Appeals come only from the debaters themselves. Sign in with Google to start; you'll then prove which debater you are, once.