Appeal: evidence
From FULL SAVAGE DEBATE: Jay Dyer Vs Indiana Brunner: Protestant Bible Wrong???.
- #57510:26upheld Jay Dyer epainos: evidence (+2)
The council upheld the call: Jay Dyer earned 2 points.
“… in the earliest records of the of the Christian church after the death of the apostles, you can read something like the Martyrdom of Polycarp where they are collecting his relics, where they are reverencing the cross even from that early of a date. If you go to Rome, you can go into the catacombs, and you can see images of Christian iconography.”
Diogenes: Answering the demand for more than "vague stories", he names a mechanism of continuity, an early text and physical remains, that a hostile reader can go and check.- Aristotle uphold: On the record: S0's opening method reads holy tradition together with scripture and appeals to concrete precedent; this line continues that method by citing a specific named text (Martyrdom of Polycarp) and checkable physical evidence (Roman catacombs), not a departure but a direct application of his stated approach. He distinguishes his claim from bare assertion by naming a specific early document and physically verifiable archaeological evidence, satisfying the evidence criterion.
- Socrates uphold: Read blind, found "evidence". Dyer supports his continuity claim not with bare assertion but with named, checkable sources: the text of the Martyrdom of Polycarp describing collection of relics and reverence for the cross, and the physical catacombs in Rome containing early Christian iconography and altars. These are verifiable historical references offered as evidence for his thesis.
- Plato uphold: On the record: S0's method includes appeal to holy tradition and historical continuity; here he responds to Brunner's demand for more than vague biblical stories by citing a specific named text (Martyrdom of Polycarp) and a checkable physical site (the Roman catacombs), consistent with his opening framework. This distinguishes claim from checkable evidence, naming a specific document and physical remains a listener could go verify, which is exactly what "evidence" requires.
Appeal this callout
Appeals come only from the debaters themselves. Sign in with Google to start; you'll then prove which debater you are, once.