Appeal: direct answer
From HEATED DEBATE: Jay Dyer Vs Jake Muslim Metaphysician | Trinity Vs Tawhid -Modern Day Debate.
- #6941:24:56upheld Jay Dyer epainos: direct answer (+1)
The council upheld the call: Jay Dyer earned 1 point.
“There's one man there's one human nature. In that sense, man can pick out nature, which is a common thing, and there's three men as individuated.”
Diogenes: Faced with Gregory of Nyssa's "one man" claim, he gives the distinction the text requires — "man" picking out nature versus individuals — instead of retreating from his earlier answer that there are three men present.- Aristotle uphold: On the record: Dyer's standing framework, declared in his opening and repeated throughout (things counted differently depending on category — nature/abstract vs. individuated/concrete), is applied consistently here rather than abandoned. Asked point-blank whether there are three men or one on the platform, Dyer gives a specific, substantive answer distinguishing the sense in which "man" picks out a common nature (one) from the sense in which it picks out individuated instances (three), directly addressing the question rather than dodging or contradicting his earlier claim that there are three men present.
- Socrates uphold: Read blind, found "direct answer". Asked why he counts three men on the platform while Gregory of Nyssa says "one man," Jay answers directly by distinguishing the sense in which "man" picks out the common nature (one) from the sense in which it picks out individuated instances (three), consistent with the first-order/second-order imposition framework he had laid out earlier in the debate.
- Plato uphold: On the record: Jay has held since the opening (and repeated across the "counting by identity/division" exchanges) that different senses of a term pick out nature versus individuated instances; this answer applies that same distinction to resolve the apparent tension between his own "three men" answer and Gregory's "one man" language, rather than retreating from either. Jake pressed Jay on an apparent inconsistency between calling the three of them "three men" and Gregory of Nyssa's claim it is more proper to say "one man"; Jay directly resolves it by distinguishing what "man" picks out in each usage, which is a genuine and consistent answer rather than an evasion.
Appeal this callout
Appeals come only from the debaters themselves. Sign in with Google to start; you'll then prove which debater you are, once.