Appeal: explicit argument
From Debate MELTDOWN: Worst Opponent Yet: Austin Peterson Libertarian Debate Vs Jay Dyer.
- #73724:43upheld Austin Peterson epainos: explicit argument (+1)
The council upheld the call: Austin Peterson earned 1 point.
“… which does tend to fall apart because one of us can never be as smart as all of us. And each and it's not that there's no plan, it's that there's more planners.”
Diogenes: He gives a stated premise (dispersed knowledge beats a single planner) leading to his conclusion that centrally planned cities fail, corporate or governmental alike.- Aristotle uphold: On the record: Austin's standing first principle is that every real polity mixes market and government and that centrally planned utopias fail; this line supplies the mechanism (dispersed knowledge/many planners) for that standing claim, consistent with rather than a departure from his position. This states a plain premise (no single planner can match the dispersed knowledge of many individual planners/actors) leading to a stated conclusion (centrally planned cities, whether corporate or governmental, tend to fail) — a genuine explicit argument, not mere rhetoric.
- Socrates uphold: Read blind, found "explicit argument". Peterson states a clear premise, no single planner's knowledge can match the distributed knowledge of many individual decision-makers, to support his conclusion that centralized planning (whether by government or corporation) tends to fail, and clarifies the claim isn't "no plan" but "many planners." This underlies his recurring first principle that decentralized, individual choice outperforms central control, applied consistently to both socialist and corporate-utopian cases throughout the debate.
- Plato uphold: On the record: Austin's first principles include methodological individualism and skepticism of central planning by either state or corporation; this line states that argument plainly and does not depart from his declared framework. This states a clear premise (dispersed individual knowledge exceeds any single planner's) leading plainly to a conclusion (central planning fails whether corporate or governmental) — a textbook explicit argument, and one squarely within Austin's declared framework that individual choice and dispersed decision-making outperform centralized control.
Appeal this callout
Appeals come only from the debaters themselves. Sign in with Google to start; you'll then prove which debater you are, once.