Appeal: clarification
From Debate MELTDOWN: Worst Opponent Yet: Austin Peterson Libertarian Debate Vs Jay Dyer.
- #7671:07:21upheld Austin Peterson epainos: clarification (+1)
The council upheld the call: Austin Peterson earned 1 point.
“I guess what I'm trying to understand here is, like, are you saying that people don't have rights?”
Diogenes: Rather than assuming the position he is arguing against, he asks whether his interlocutor really denies rights — and on hearing the answer registers it as new information.- Aristotle uphold: On the record: S1 has consistently framed the exchange around rights being real; this question shows him testing his assumption about Jim Bob's framework before continuing to argue, consistent with his stated openness to being shown wrong, not a departure from his position. Austin explicitly asks Jim Bob to confirm his actual position ("are you saying that people don't have rights?") instead of assuming it, and immediately after registers the answer as new information ("I was not aware that you did not believe that people did"), which is a clean instance of asking for clarification instead of assuming.
- Socrates uphold: Read blind, found "clarification". Rather than assuming what Jim Bob's critique of rights-based reasoning entails, Austin asks him directly to confirm whether he is denying that people have rights at all — a legitimate request to pin down the opponent's actual position before responding to it.
- Plato uphold: On the record: S1's method throughout has been to press for the basis of claims and engage with what's actually asserted; this fits that same practice rather than departing from it. Austin directly asks whether his interlocutor is denying that people have rights, rather than assuming that position, and follows up by registering the answer as new information ("I did not know that you did not believe...") — a clean instance of asking for clarification instead of assuming.
Appeal this callout
Appeals come only from the debaters themselves. Sign in with Google to start; you'll then prove which debater you are, once.