Appeal: evidence
From Debate! Pagan vs. Orthodox: Logos, Language & Metaphysics - Jay Dyer Vs CB Robertson.
- #90355:15upheld Jay Dyer epainos: evidence (+1)
The council upheld the call: Jay Dyer earned 1 point.
“I'd be happy to make any number of arguments to to demonstrate how that's the case down to even the liturgical worship services basically being directly analogs to direct analogs to the temple and synagogue system.”
Diogenes: Challenged on how he can be certain his tradition reads scripture rightly, Jay names a checkable mechanism — structural continuity between Orthodox liturgy and the temple/synagogue system — rather than resting on the bare claim of authority, and he explicitly refuses to let the convert numbers count as proof.- Aristotle uphold: On the record: Jay has held since the opening that Orthodoxy is the fulfillment/continuation of prior revelation with real historical/traditional continuity as its mechanism; this line is consistent with that stated position, not a new or contradictory move. Jay names a specific, checkable structural claim (Orthodox liturgy as analog to temple/synagogue worship) rather than resting purely on assertion, and moments later explicitly disclaims that convert numbers alone would prove the point ("maybe we're tricking everybody"), which is the claim/evidence distinction the category requires, even if minor since he doesn't elaborate the parallels in depth.
- Socrates uphold: Read blind, found "evidence". Rather than resting on the bare assertion that Orthodoxy fulfills the Old Testament, Jay points to a specific, checkable claim: that Orthodox liturgical worship is structurally analogous to the temple and synagogue system, which is the kind of concrete referent that could be examined rather than a purely rhetorical gesture. It is offered only as a placeholder he does not elaborate on later, so its weight is modest, but it is genuinely evidentiary rather than vague.
- Plato uphold: On the record: Jay has held since the opening that Orthodoxy is the fulfillment of the Old Testament economy; naming the liturgy-temple/synagogue continuity as a checkable mechanism is consistent with, not a departure from, that claim. Jay's recorded method argues from within Orthodox tradition (scripture plus tradition) as the fulfillment of prophecy; here, pressed on how he can be certain of Orthodoxy's reading, he points to a specific, checkable structural parallel (liturgy vs. temple/synagogue practice) rather than resting on bare authority or convert counts, which he explicitly disclaims as proof.
Appeal this callout
Appeals come only from the debaters themselves. Sign in with Google to start; you'll then prove which debater you are, once.