Appeal: explicit argument
From Debate! Pagan vs. Orthodox: Logos, Language & Metaphysics - Jay Dyer Vs CB Robertson.
- #9221:46:48upheld Jay Dyer epainos: explicit argument (+2)
The council upheld the call: Jay Dyer earned 2 points.
“… it it's a transcendental necessity. There has to be objective truth or else you can't know anything. Knowledge becomes impossible. This is the strength of the transcendental argument.”
Diogenes: Jay states the transcendental argument in its bare form — the denial of objective truth destroys the possibility of knowledge — laying out plainly the principle he has been applying against CB all evening.- Aristotle uphold: On the record: This is precisely Jay's declared opening method (TAG: Orthodox Christianity/objective truth as precondition of intelligibility), stated consistently and applied here without alteration. Jay states a clear premise (denying objective truth makes knowledge impossible) and conclusion (therefore objective truth is a transcendental necessity), which is the transcendental argument stated plainly and applied to the live exchange.
- Socrates uphold: Read blind, found "explicit argument". Jay states his transcendental argument as a plain premise-conclusion: if there were no objective truth, knowledge itself would be impossible, therefore objective truth must exist as a precondition of intelligibility. This is the core thesis he set out at the start of the debate and defends consistently, stated here in explicit premise-and-conclusion form rather than left implicit.
- Plato uphold: On the record: Jay declared at the opening that his method is TAG and has invoked it throughout against CB's shifting subjectivism/skepticism; this line is a clean restatement of that same standing thesis. Jay's opening framework is explicitly the transcendental argument for God/objective truth as the precondition of intelligibility; this quote states that argument's core premise-conclusion structure plainly (denial of objective truth destroys the possibility of knowledge, therefore objective truth is a transcendental necessity), which is exactly his recorded method, not a new or drifting claim.
Appeal this callout
Appeals come only from the debaters themselves. Sign in with Google to start; you'll then prove which debater you are, once.