Appeal: evidence
From Debate! Pagan vs. Orthodox: Logos, Language & Metaphysics - Jay Dyer Vs CB Robertson.
- #9282:01:54upheld Jay Dyer epainos: evidence (+2)
The council upheld the call: Jay Dyer earned 2 points.
“… the most elevated mystics like Saint Gregory of Palamas, who were also the most vociferous debaters of their day... composed numerous treatises based around Apodictic logic, which is our Sicilian [Aristotelian] logic, such as Apotheistic [the Apodictic] treatise on the holy spirit against the Roman Catholics…”
Diogenes: Against CB's closing claim that rigorous logical debate is antithetical to the mystical spirit of Christianity, Jay names a specific figure and specific works in which the same man is both the tradition's great hesychast and its great logician.- Aristotle uphold: On the record: S0 opened as the Orthodox presuppositionalist defending the tradition's coherence and has consistently rebutted CB's claims by grounding them in specific patristic sources (e.g., citing John's use of Hebrew wisdom literature earlier); here he continues that pattern by naming a specific historical figure and specific treatises to rebut CB's claim that logic and mysticism are in tension within Orthodoxy. Jay cites a checkable historical particular (Gregory Palamas and his specific apodictic treatises against Rome) rather than a bare assertion, which is precisely what distinguishes evidence from mere claim, and this is consistent with his standing method throughout the debate of grounding metaphysical/theological claims in named patristic sources.
- Socrates uphold: Read blind, found "evidence". In direct answer to CB's closing claim that rigorous debate/logic is antithetical to Christianity's mystical spirit, Dyer cites a specific, checkable historical figure and text (Gregory Palamas, a hesychast mystic who also wrote treatises using apodictic/Aristotelian logic against the Latins) rather than resting on bare assertion, grounding his claim in verifiable evidence.
- Plato uphold: On the record: Jay held throughout that Orthodoxy's metaphysic unifies logic, revelation, and mystical practice without internal tension (stated explicitly earlier: "there's no fundamental tension between... mystical prayer and logic because they're all summed up in the logos"); this citation is a direct extension of that standing claim, responding to CB's final challenge rather than a new position. Jay directly answers CB's closing claim that debate/logic-mode is antithetical to Christian mysticism by naming a specific historical figure (Gregory Palamas) and specific checkable treatises combining rigorous dialectic with hesychast mysticism, which is a citation of something checkable rather than a bare assertion, fitting "evidence."
Appeal this callout
Appeals come only from the debaters themselves. Sign in with Google to start; you'll then prove which debater you are, once.