Appeal: direct answer
From HEATED DEBATE! “jesusandwhatnot” Vs Jay Dyer! His ‘Gotcha’ Fails LOL.
- #99819:29set aside: no opponent on the floor Jay Dyer epainos: direct answer (+2)
Set aside, and nothing counts: no opponent was on the floor when it was said.
“Orthodox canon law we have economia. So we apply the principles of economia to all of these situations, and that's why it's not just sexual immorality.”
Diogenes: Asked precisely how Orthodoxy treats divorce outside the exception clause, Jay names the operative principle and reasons a fortiori from abuse and apostasy cases rather than deflecting.- Aristotle uphold: On the record: S3's position from the opening has been that Scripture's exception clause is read within Church tradition rather than legalistically, with economia extending grounds beyond adultery, and this answer restates and applies that same framework to the caller's specific question rather than departing from it. The caller's question was framed around whether the exception clause is exhaustive and whether Orthodox divorce practice honestly acknowledges sin versus Catholic-style retroactive invalidity; Jay's answer names economia as the governing principle, gives concrete a fortiori cases (abuse, apostasy, threat to children) showing why sexual immorality cannot be the sole ground, and frames Orthodox practice as pastoral concession rather than a legal fiction of non-marriage, which is substantively responsive to the comparison the caller drew rather than a deflection.
- Socrates uphold: Read blind, found "direct answer". The caller asked specifically why Orthodox divorce isn't confined to Jesus' stated "sexual immorality" exception and how the church treats other grounds. Dyer answers on point, naming the operative principle (economia) and then, in the lines immediately following, gives concrete reasons (abuse, threat to children, apostasy to Satanism) why the exception clause is read as illustrative rather than exhaustive — engaging the substance of the question from his own stated framework rather than deflecting it.
- Plato uphold: On the record: S3's opening and consistent position is that economia, not a legalistic exception-clause reading, governs Orthodox divorce practice; this line is a direct, on-topic elaboration of that very position in response to the caller's specific question, not a departure. The caller asked a specific question about whether Orthodox divorce outside the sexual-immorality clause is acknowledged as sin or reasoned around like Catholic annulments; Jay directly answers by naming economia as the operative principle and reasoning through abuse/apostasy cases, which is exactly the content of his recorded first-principle position on economia extending grounds beyond the exception clause.
Appeal this callout
Appeals come only from the debaters themselves. Sign in with Google to start; you'll then prove which debater you are, once.